vwpowwow wrote: I believe that red light cameras do not reduce accidents where they are placed. If they worked then the city's would not have increased tickets from them. People are going to drive and obey or disobey safety regulations regardless of a camera or not. I believe that a number of people have been wrongly ticketed from them. This is why there is such an argument against them. Having an actual officer at a trouble intersection is the best bet. I would rather go to court arguing an officers testimony than a speechless camera.

Well of course you would! You would rather try to make the officer out to be a liar than try to prove that the pictures/video of you and your vehicle didn't flagrantly break the law. What a joke!

The red light camera doesn't prevent accidents, drivers prevent accidents by obeying the instruction of the traffic signal. The decision of drivers to "rush the yellow light" is what causes the accidents. The intention of the yellow is to give the driver ample warning that the light is about to change to red; therefore, the driver should be preparing to stop BEFORE the light changes red. The accidents are caused by drivers who don't want to wait another cycle through the light and therefore stomp the gas pedal in an attempt to get through before the red. Misjudgement is the cause of the accident as when the light changes red for one direction, the other direction gets the green. When this side proceeds into the intersection as directed by the signal, unfortunately, a lot of times they meet the driver who is usually traveling faster than the speed limit due to "rushing the yellow" and the end result is called an accident. Traffic cameras DO WORK. Having seen the photo of a company vehicle driven by an employee who was in the middle of an intersection when the photo was taken, I can say that the photo was very clear as to the location of the vehicle, listed the date, time and location of the camera, as well as how much time had elasped since the traffic signal had turned red and the snap of the photo. Argument of such valid information is a lot harder to argue in court than the simple "I saw" testimony of a law enforcement officer. I'd rather have the cameras in place, freeing the officers to run radar in other areas where the speed limit signs seem to have no meaning!

I believe that red light cameras do not reduce accidents where they are placed. If they worked then the city's would not have increased tickets from them. People are going to drive and obey or disobey safety regulations regardless of a camera or not. I believe that a number of people have been wrongly ticketed from them. This is why there is such an argument against them. Having an actual officer at a trouble intersection is the best bet. I would rather go to court arguing an officers testimony than a speechless camera.